That’s Not My Experience
Jan 27, 10- (by Mama MPJ)
- 12 responses

- Sober Salon
Email This Post
Years ago, I met a woman who, when she was disagreeing with her partner, would tell him, “That’s not my reality.” She had a way of saying it that implied there was a real Reality (hers) and some alternate Crazytown Reality (his). You had only to hear those few words and know that he was totally batshit and she not only had a PhD in Reality, she was the president and CEO of Reality. In recovery, I’ve found myself clinging to similar mantras — most often “that’s not my experience” or “that’s not my truth” — and often (admittedly) with that same snarky undertone of superiority for protection. It’s been hard to let go of feeling threatened when other people see things differently, but I find I do feel better when I am able to simply state where I am, let other people be where they are and not tag on, in a whisper, “P.S. I’m right.”
I had a bit of that “I’m right” feeling when I was reading the article “Sex Addiction: A B.S. Excuse for Not Thinking” by psychologist Michael Bader, who writes:
“Traditional addictions like those to alcohol or heroin always involve the presence of tolerance and withdrawal; that is, increasing amounts of the substance are required to achieve the same effect, and in its absence the addict suffers an increasingly painful psychophysiological state as the body and brain rebound. But when it comes to sex addiction, physiological tolerance and withdrawal are usually not present, and if they are, they don’t govern the addict’s life in the same way that, say, opiates do. Sex addicts get anxious when they can’t get their “fix” — they don’t go into DTs.”
My first thought was, “Ha! WRONG, Michael Bader! Sex addicts do experience both tolerance and withdrawal! No, not the DTs, but if you want to get technical about it, heroin addicts don’t experience the DTs either; that condition is specific to alcohol and barbiturates. So there.”
After all, I had my own experience to back me up. I saw first hand how my husband Mark required increasing amounts of the substance to achieve the same effect: how his porn use and affairs escalated over time. About a year prior to learning about his sex addiction, I discovered him engaging in pornographic online video chats. When I asked him why he was doing it, he told me that he couldn’t get the same feeling from looking at pictures that he used to, so he escalated to video, but then he found that video by itself wasn’t enough and he really needed interactive video to get that same feeling. If I had known about addiction and tolerance at the time, I might have realized then what was going on. Instead it just seemed strange, confusing and disturbing that he wasn’t satisfied with just pornographic images anymore, that he seemed to want more and more.
And when Mark stopped porn use, masturbation and affairs, he did go through withdrawal, and it wasn’t just a little bit of manageable, run-of-the-mill anxiety. He thought death was coming from him in the form of houseflies. He screamed. He cried. Sometimes he seemed suicidal and sometimes enraged and violent. It was real. And it was terrifying. The fact that he’d hidden so much from me made me feel as if I didn’t know the man I married, and the way he acted — completely unlike anything I’d ever seen from him before — in those early weeks of recovery only added to my fears that the man I shared my house with was a stranger, capable of who knew what evils.
I know the way my world used to look, and I know how it felt to have that all turn upside down, and I know that concepts like “addiction” and “tolerance” and “withdrawal” were what helped me make sense of things again and set my world right. So when someone says those don’t exist or minimizes them, I feel my world tilting again. And I want to set it right by making Michael Bader wrong, but there’s another way: I can let Michael Bader have his own experience with sex addiction, and I tell my story. I can look at that paragraph and say: “That may be someone else’s experience. And that’s ok. There may be ’sex addicts’ who don’t experience tolerance or withdrawal, or who don’t experience it the way Mark did. In fact, maybe most so-called sex addicts don’t. That doesn’t change me or where I am. That’s just not my experience.”
And sometimes I can even say it without adding “P.S. My experience is the right one.”
Related articles:
Stumble it!
Delicious Facebook
Respond now.
Previous post: « Switching Addictions
Next post: A PIECE OF CAKE »
















I rather suspect that any experience you, I, or anyone perceives as valid and true IS “the right one” for us at that moment–and after. Especially if we are trying to live well, help others and grow spiritually. Especially if we are clean and somehow sober.
My experience is frequently the “right one”, for me, not for everyone else…
Thank you Mama MPJ, for another enlightening post. Come read me sometime…I just began posting on TSR few days ago.
I’ve been reading you, Steve E. And it’s nice to have you here on TSR. I’m just not a big commenter. I’ll have to pop out of lurkdom soon, huh?
You go, girl!!! And I’ll add it for you. “P.S. Your experience is right.”
Yeah, but what really burns me is that so many of the people weighing in on sex addiction have no experience *at all* with sex addiction. I can accept when someone who’s had similar experiences disagrees with me, but when someone who hasn’t even had that experience in any way, shape or form tells me I’m wrong, those are fightin’ words.
Experts sort things into addiction and not-addiction, and it’s somewhat arbitrary. Gambling addiction is not supposed to be a real addiction, but is instead called an impulse control disorder or compulsion.
One difference between gambling addiction / compulsion / whatever and sex addiction / compulsion / whatever is that people aren’t writing books called, “Gambling addiction: A BS excuse for not thinking.” There are a very small number of books and articles on the “Is gambling addiction real?” subject. I wonder why sex addiction is singled out for all the attention and debate.
Astrid: Why is sex addiction singled out? Because SEX SELLS! (Shhhhhh. Whisper: maybe?)
Astrid, I suspect it’s because people romanticize sex (and I mean that in the broadest sense). We think there’s something different and special about it — either that it is so sacred (true loooove) or so natural (”it’s a basic human drive”) that it’s not like anything else. We set it apart, and so we set sex addiction apart.
“either that it is so sacred (true loooove) or so natural (”it’s a basic human drive”) that it’s not like anything else.”
Yup–well said. But it’s the very fact that something (a behavior, a substance) has been taken out of it’s sacred or natural context and turned into something overly routine and, therefore, unnatural, that makes it an addiction. All the other things people become addicted to–alcohol, food, drugs–have their sacred and natural place in our lives as well, but, especially in the case of alcohol and drugs, that sacred and natural place is less obvious.
Usually when I say anything along the lines of “that’s not my experience,” I feel like I’m asking for someone to tell me my experience is valid.
Withdrawal was miserable for me too. It’s what helped me accept addiction as a valid model for what was going on with me. Good thing too, because with an addiction there’s hope. When you’re just a shitty person, the best solution I came up with was a me-ectomy so I wouldn’t taint the ones I loved.
I think any substance that people abuse -whether an activity like gambling or sex, or something else we put into our bodies- is often labeled a not-addiction at first. Socially, we have learned that addiction is applied to substances; before alcoholism was accepted as a disease or addiction, those who abused alcohol were simply considered weak-minded people who couldn’t control their own impulses. I think as we become aware of the different ’substances’ to which people become addicted, we just revert to that same way of thinking - “it’s just poor old Joe, not knowing when to stop”.
Someday, sex and gambling will be as commonly thought of as “real” addictions as alcohol is now, and people will be debating over the next thing.
The thing is…there ARE substances involved. Brain chemicals. Stimulation through gambling, sex, or other means does produce a high of sorts. To call it compulsive behavior is definitely misleading when you really think about it. Gamblers and sex addicts have long internal and external rituals that are set in motion long before the “act” takes place. That is hardly compulsive. They begin entering their high during the planning and fantasizing stages.
On the topic of “my experience” versus someone else’s, it certainly is helpful to peace of mind and recovery. At the same time, when books are being published, and so-called experts are spouting off on television, it is really really important that we get other voices in the mix.
Which reminds me…when are you and M going to write that book, huh?